141![Supreme Court, U.S. FILED NAR~i I Supreme Court, U.S. FILED NAR~i I](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/7a5cc137ab2a1525c3d6eebd847b2590.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: franklingraves.files.wordpress.comLanguage: English - Date: 2015-04-21 14:53:52
|
---|
142![No ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States No ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/fe09091a5cfa7e45ca9e7c096c99abfd.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.americanbar.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-02-04 17:09:59
|
---|
143![Nos, 14-562, 14-571, IN THE In the Supreme Court of the United States ________ JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Nos, 14-562, 14-571, IN THE In the Supreme Court of the United States ________ JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al.,](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/fbdb186506c4a442d53dec1663dae514.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.freedomtomarry.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2015-03-06 16:51:04
|
---|
144![NOS, 14-562, 14-571 & In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, ET AL., Petitioners, NOS, 14-562, 14-571 & In the Supreme Court of the United States JAMES OBERGEFELL, ET AL., Petitioners,](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/bd4e4a7e5722656a7e16146149ac4291.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.freedomtomarry.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2015-03-10 11:36:39
|
---|
145![NoIn the Supreme Court of the United States FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. NoIn the Supreme Court of the United States FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v.](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/757be31e66492ee09ee9e49558f99b2a.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: sblog.s3.amazonaws.comLanguage: English - Date: 2012-11-24 21:24:44
|
---|
146![Shelby County: One Year Later By Tomas Lopez One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted the most powerful provision in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 — a law widely regarded as the most effective piece of civil rights Shelby County: One Year Later By Tomas Lopez One year ago, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted the most powerful provision in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 — a law widely regarded as the most effective piece of civil rights](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/6df570244e820758a85771f7d06fb38f.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.brennancenter.org- Date: 2014-06-24 11:46:50
|
---|
147![The Supreme Court victory in United States v. Windsor striking down the discriminatory federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) affirms that all loving and committed couples who are married deserve equal legal respect and The Supreme Court victory in United States v. Windsor striking down the discriminatory federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) affirms that all loving and committed couples who are married deserve equal legal respect and](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/1f71d2fceff60302540c16b9be7a7039.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.freedomtomarry.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-07-03 14:04:46
|
---|
148![CFO Insights Bending the cost curve on health care With the U.S. Supreme Court’s blessing and the security of the 2012 election results, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ofor ACA) is rolling out na CFO Insights Bending the cost curve on health care With the U.S. Supreme Court’s blessing and the security of the 2012 election results, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ofor ACA) is rolling out na](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/d2876923f0921e0a1732bfc126b8828b.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: deloitte.wsj.comLanguage: English |
---|
149![Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act Gonzales v. Oregon and the Right to Die O Supreme Court Considers Challenge to Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act Gonzales v. Oregon and the Right to Die O](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/0781299bfef8597f1d88ada49ee71b7f.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.pewforum.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-09-05 11:41:00
|
---|
150![The Supreme Court victory in United States v. Windsor striking down the discriminatory federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) affirms that all loving and committed couples who are married deserve equal legal respect and The Supreme Court victory in United States v. Windsor striking down the discriminatory federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) affirms that all loving and committed couples who are married deserve equal legal respect and](https://www.pdfsearch.io/img/5b2746072b2ed517c936dfe337887bc7.jpg) | Add to Reading ListSource URL: www.freedomtomarry.orgLanguage: English - Date: 2013-07-03 14:04:38
|
---|